Thursday, July 23, 2009
SIAPA PERLU DISIASAT AL-KHAHFI PAS ATAU ZAHID MAMIDI?
.............Wolfowitz, SAIS, CIA, SAIC This item, a rescue from one of our comments threads, calls attention to a White House cover-up of Wolfowitz's ethical lapses (explaining why the WH does not want the Board to confirm the Ad Hoc Committee report) and calls attention to another aspect of the World Bank scandal involving Wolfowitz-Riza-Cleveland and Anwar Ibrahim. The Three Strikes:
Strike One: In late 2000 the administration of Johns Hopkins University had determined to take significant action against Paul Wolfowitz, then Dean of the School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), for an improper sexual relationship with a SAIS subordinate.
University action was interrupted when Wolfowitz informed the University he was leaving to take a position with the Bush Administration…………….
Produk intelektual Amerika.
Dari kiri, almarhum Ismail Al Faruqi (Universiti Temple), John Esposito dan Anwar (Universiti Georgetown).
Almarhum Ismail Faruqi telah mati dibunuh. Menurut laporan akhbar Philadelphia Inquirer bertarikh 11 Julai 1987, Yusuf Ali (tertuduh yang didakwa membunuh) memberi keterangan dalam mahkamah bahwa dia terpaksa membunuh Al Faruqi kerana beliau terlibat mendorong kegiatan homoseksual di kalangan para pelajarnya, di universiti Temple.
Georgetown Universiti pula terkenal sebagai universiti mengkaderkan pemimpin seluruh dunia...
HEBATNYA dia...
..... Anwar pernah dianggap sebagai 'Pemimpin al Khahfi' oleh ahli-ahli PAS dan benar-benar berharap Anwar akan menyertai PAS?
Ustaz Idris Ahmad
Tue | Jul 21, 09 | 7:26:56 pm MYT
Harakah Daily.
…..satu lagi hadiah UNTUK PAS DAN PKR juga pada rakyat...Malaysia amnya.
…… Zahid atau Anwar mesti disiasat kenapa beliau berani berbuat demikian.......
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Komentar :
Post a Comment
Pemilik Blog tidak bertanggungjawab atas komen-komen yang di buat.